Last week I went somewhere by car. I can’t actually remember the last time I did that.
Anyway, I got culture shock.
I know in a sort of abstract way that when you’re in a car, you’re cosseted in a well designed, complete system designed to help you get to places with the least stress or worry, but for the first few minutes it was quite startling: we came to a junction, there was a sign with three options to get where we were going. Where the hills were steep, there was a way cut through. Valley ahead? There’ll be a bridge. When we were going to the autobahn the system (and the navigator) gently guided us there along straight smooth roads. Things which I find normal, like checking google earth for cycle routes that disappear into fields, a lack of signs*, carrying three maps all the time, and being suddenly sent along hideously indirect side roads, are not a part of the driving experience. Everything is done to make driving incredibly simple.
I guess this is on my mind because I was recently at a meeting of cyclists and civil servants in Ostfildern, where we were taken to the meeting point of ‘four major cycling routes’. These turned out to be a surfaced farm track, a segregated shared bike and pedestrian route which stopped abruptly at a bus stop, a residential street with a bike painted on it, and a busy main road. If a council built a road ‘network’ like that, there would be a small mutiny. Whereas cars have a network in Ostfildern, cyclists have cycle paths.
With my usual diplomatic brilliance I suggested that a better name for this would be ‘a collection of signs and some paint on a road’.
I guess that’s why I don’t get invited to those meetings very often.
*To be fair that’s improving, and you usually can expect bike lane signs in most places, and usually the routes are safe enough, but still…

4 comments
Comments feed for this article
July 10, 2010 at 10:38 am
anna
True indeed. But it’s not just that the “network” is missing. Also the labeling lacks. I get constantly lost on cycle paths I use for the first time. Because, for example, they are sometimes too far away from the “real road” in order to be able to read street names and such. I just never know where I have to turn. Or sometimes the cycle paths turns without telling me where it goes (and leaving me no way to get off either).
July 11, 2010 at 3:51 pm
Andy in Germany
Hi Anna…
Yes, we have all of those here, although signage is getting better. Most of out cy<cle lanes run until the towns, and as soon as the roads start to get narrow (as in: When you really need to cycle lane) they vanish.
There are other local places much better than Ostfildern. I'll cover some of those soon.
July 10, 2010 at 12:11 pm
disgruntled
I find now when I’m in a car that I can’t get used to the assumption that I’m not invisible. If I see a car waiting to turn across traffic or get onto a roundabout I’m completely prepared for it to launch itself right in my path as though I’m not there … or on a bicycle.
Our few bike paths are actually really nicely signed, we’ve got what amounts to a ‘bypass’ with regular junctions indicating which road they connect to. Just like a proper bypass. It’s lovely. Shame it’s only three miles long…
July 11, 2010 at 3:54 pm
Andy in Germany
I know what you mean, I was watching cars and trying to make eye contact with the driver. all the way there.
That’s the trouble with cycle lanes as opposed to cycle infrastructure. Lanes last as long as the council’s enthusiasm, which isn’t usually very far.